I hate, hate, hate the gendering of children. It really wraps my knickers all in a knot. Knot. Knickers. I hate that we limit kids with bizarre expectations of what boys and girls are supposed to like, supposed to be, supposed to do, supposed to feel. I hate that people become very uncomfortable when people guess the sex of their baby wrong (because really, a beautiful baby is a beautiful baby is a beautiful baby!) I hate that girls aren't supposed to be handsome and boys aren't supposed to be pretty. (And I defy anyone who sees my Boy-o to tell me he ain't pretty**).
I hate that you can't shop on-line for kids clothes or toys without first checking off whether you are looking for girls or for boys. I hate that they market the same freaking toys like bikes or pushy cars or kids shopping carts in pink and blue for further gender segregation. I hate that pink and blue is considered gender segregation.
I hate that all of my son's life, people have taken his exuberance and infinite energy and speed as proof of his "boyness," though I take some solace in the fact that Girlio is fast showing signs of following right in his footsteps. I hate that boys are still told not to cry, and even when parents aren't overtly that ignorant, boys are still encouraged to "shake it off" in ways that girls are not. Anyhoo.
Knot. In. My. Knickers. Big one. Huge.
It breaks my heart to think that my rainbow, sparkles, flowers loving boy, who cries freely when sad or hurt, who loves a good cuddle more than anything will be coaxed or shamed away from these things because they are not "boy-ish" enough.
It breaks my heart equally to think that my baby girl, who is already now showing signs of being a rough and tumble, take-no-prisoners, world-here-I-come kinda kid; who already loves playing with trains and trucks and making "brmmm brrmmm brmmmm" sounds, will be directed and encouraged to love dolls and play house, and flowers and sparkles more than she loves sports and trucks and trains and active play.
But what I hate even more than thinking about these inevitabilities, is the fact that we don't even consider WHY this streamlining still happens. And here's my take (which will probably piss some peeps off, but there ya go). We as a culture are uncomfortable with sensitive, non-sporty boys who like the colour pink because we as a culture are still hugely homophobic. There. I said it.
I know loads of cool parents who have no real problem with folks being gay who would die a thousand inner deaths watching their son wear pink, or drive in a toy Barbie car, or let them pick out a rainbow sparkle shirt from the store. Call it what it is folks. Homophobia. Boys who like pink, who cry easily, who like "girl" things, who are sensitive, who don't like sports and would rather go to dance class, etc. etc. are sissies. And we are scared of our boy being sissies because sissy = unmasculine = faggy. Period. There is no amount of spluttering or excuses that will change this icky reality. We really need to get our shit together, because frankly, I expect more from our generation. A whole lot more. C'mon people.
And while we have slightly more cultural tolerance for girls who step outside of acceptable gendered play and appearance boundaries, like say girls who play sports traditionally played only by boys or who aren't comfortable with pink and frou frou, this is only acceptable for a brief period of time and to a certain degree. We have a name for it - the tomboy phase. The expectation is that eventually, all girls will embrace their 'girliness,' develop the dream of becoming a princess and marrying 'the one'. You know, Prince Charming. And when girls don't embrace girliness, flouff and frou frou evenutally, we get mighty uncomfortable. And yes, you guessed it. It's homophobia my friends. No long hair? No dresses? No make-up. Not all into giggling and weddings and boys? That's dyke-y my friends, and we don't like it.
My quarrel here is not with girliness, or dreaming of being a princess, because as a femme-tastic queer grrrl, I'm here to tell ya, oh- I AM a princess. I wish everyday could be a dress-up, put on the bling, going to a fabulous tea-party kind of day (though believe you-me... it ain't). My problem is that the princess-ification of girl culture is more heterosexualization, that is, about landing Prince Charming and being taught to value the self for how it can attract others (yep, good old P.C. again) rather than the love of pretty sparkly things because those pretty sparkly things make you smile on the inside (and oh they DO make me smile on the inside :-)
Many people argue that gendered behaviour is innate, and there may be some (and I do emphasize SOME) truth to this. Boy-o was drawn to typical boy things more than I ever thought he would be from an early age. BUT - I believe very very strongly that the reason he is also drawn to things like rainbows, pink, flowers, sparkles, dancing, singing, snuggling and cooking in his wonderful second hand toy kitchen etc. is because he hasn't yet been told that these things aren't "for" boys. A great example of this happened this past weekend. We were at a picnic Pride event last weekend where there was a free tattoo booth for kiddos. Boy-o picked out a beautiful hibiscus flower, in shades of pink and orange with plenty 'o sparkles. He was so proud, showing it off to everyone and making movements with his arm to emphasize it, the way a newly engaged woman might self-consciously emphasize her bling hand. (It was a really nice tat - I got in line for one but then felt guilty about the kid waiting behind me - sigh).
My point here - and I do have one - is that given a choice, Boy-o chose a pink sparkly flower tattoo over lizards and turtles and frogs and all kinds of other options that might have been interpreted as more gender neutral (which is a term I find silly, but whatever). Boys are steered to "boy" things. They are discouraged from pinkness and sparkliness and feelings-ness and all the other things that girls are steered towards. Girls are steered away from brrrm-brrrm Tonka trucks, from loudness and general ballsy-ness and towards all of the aforementioned "girly" things and ways of being. This bit is clearly cultural, not innate.
Wanna know what I hate the absolute most? The fact that I am plagued by the fear that people will accuse me of trying to "turn" my kids gay if I let my son wear pink sparkliness or tiaras or dresses, or if I encourage my daughter towards trucks and overalls and discourage Barbie and Disney princess world. And at the risk of sounding like a broken record - yes, you guessed it, it's another example of ___________ (Fill in the blank). I'll even give you a hint.
It starts with an "h".
** but sorry, I just can't bring myself to post face pics of my kiddies on here because I think it's an invasion of what little privacy my big mouth affords them :-)
I hate that you can't shop on-line for kids clothes or toys without first checking off whether you are looking for girls or for boys. I hate that they market the same freaking toys like bikes or pushy cars or kids shopping carts in pink and blue for further gender segregation. I hate that pink and blue is considered gender segregation.
I hate that all of my son's life, people have taken his exuberance and infinite energy and speed as proof of his "boyness," though I take some solace in the fact that Girlio is fast showing signs of following right in his footsteps. I hate that boys are still told not to cry, and even when parents aren't overtly that ignorant, boys are still encouraged to "shake it off" in ways that girls are not. Anyhoo.
Knot. In. My. Knickers. Big one. Huge.
It breaks my heart equally to think that my baby girl, who is already now showing signs of being a rough and tumble, take-no-prisoners, world-here-I-come kinda kid; who already loves playing with trains and trucks and making "brmmm brrmmm brmmmm" sounds, will be directed and encouraged to love dolls and play house, and flowers and sparkles more than she loves sports and trucks and trains and active play.
But what I hate even more than thinking about these inevitabilities, is the fact that we don't even consider WHY this streamlining still happens. And here's my take (which will probably piss some peeps off, but there ya go). We as a culture are uncomfortable with sensitive, non-sporty boys who like the colour pink because we as a culture are still hugely homophobic. There. I said it.
I know loads of cool parents who have no real problem with folks being gay who would die a thousand inner deaths watching their son wear pink, or drive in a toy Barbie car, or let them pick out a rainbow sparkle shirt from the store. Call it what it is folks. Homophobia. Boys who like pink, who cry easily, who like "girl" things, who are sensitive, who don't like sports and would rather go to dance class, etc. etc. are sissies. And we are scared of our boy being sissies because sissy = unmasculine = faggy. Period. There is no amount of spluttering or excuses that will change this icky reality. We really need to get our shit together, because frankly, I expect more from our generation. A whole lot more. C'mon people.
And while we have slightly more cultural tolerance for girls who step outside of acceptable gendered play and appearance boundaries, like say girls who play sports traditionally played only by boys or who aren't comfortable with pink and frou frou, this is only acceptable for a brief period of time and to a certain degree. We have a name for it - the tomboy phase. The expectation is that eventually, all girls will embrace their 'girliness,' develop the dream of becoming a princess and marrying 'the one'. You know, Prince Charming. And when girls don't embrace girliness, flouff and frou frou evenutally, we get mighty uncomfortable. And yes, you guessed it. It's homophobia my friends. No long hair? No dresses? No make-up. Not all into giggling and weddings and boys? That's dyke-y my friends, and we don't like it.
My quarrel here is not with girliness, or dreaming of being a princess, because as a femme-tastic queer grrrl, I'm here to tell ya, oh- I AM a princess. I wish everyday could be a dress-up, put on the bling, going to a fabulous tea-party kind of day (though believe you-me... it ain't). My problem is that the princess-ification of girl culture is more heterosexualization, that is, about landing Prince Charming and being taught to value the self for how it can attract others (yep, good old P.C. again) rather than the love of pretty sparkly things because those pretty sparkly things make you smile on the inside (and oh they DO make me smile on the inside :-)
Many people argue that gendered behaviour is innate, and there may be some (and I do emphasize SOME) truth to this. Boy-o was drawn to typical boy things more than I ever thought he would be from an early age. BUT - I believe very very strongly that the reason he is also drawn to things like rainbows, pink, flowers, sparkles, dancing, singing, snuggling and cooking in his wonderful second hand toy kitchen etc. is because he hasn't yet been told that these things aren't "for" boys. A great example of this happened this past weekend. We were at a picnic Pride event last weekend where there was a free tattoo booth for kiddos. Boy-o picked out a beautiful hibiscus flower, in shades of pink and orange with plenty 'o sparkles. He was so proud, showing it off to everyone and making movements with his arm to emphasize it, the way a newly engaged woman might self-consciously emphasize her bling hand. (It was a really nice tat - I got in line for one but then felt guilty about the kid waiting behind me - sigh).
My point here - and I do have one - is that given a choice, Boy-o chose a pink sparkly flower tattoo over lizards and turtles and frogs and all kinds of other options that might have been interpreted as more gender neutral (which is a term I find silly, but whatever). Boys are steered to "boy" things. They are discouraged from pinkness and sparkliness and feelings-ness and all the other things that girls are steered towards. Girls are steered away from brrrm-brrrm Tonka trucks, from loudness and general ballsy-ness and towards all of the aforementioned "girly" things and ways of being. This bit is clearly cultural, not innate.
Wanna know what I hate the absolute most? The fact that I am plagued by the fear that people will accuse me of trying to "turn" my kids gay if I let my son wear pink sparkliness or tiaras or dresses, or if I encourage my daughter towards trucks and overalls and discourage Barbie and Disney princess world. And at the risk of sounding like a broken record - yes, you guessed it, it's another example of ___________ (Fill in the blank). I'll even give you a hint.
It starts with an "h".
** but sorry, I just can't bring myself to post face pics of my kiddies on here because I think it's an invasion of what little privacy my big mouth affords them :-)
Sing it, sister! Funny, I was just looking at my old posts the other and found something similar.
ReplyDeleteI still disagree that it is homophobia, though... If you dig through it, many folks are NOT concerned about their boys liking pink because they might be gay. They are concerned about their boys being gay because they might like pink! God forbid! A boy might be effeminate! My boy will be called girly! Underlying a huge chunk of what we call homophobia is misogyny, pure and simple. In a culture that still looks down on girls, all the anti-homophobia messages in the world will never help our boys.
ReplyDeletembtrue:I don't think we can actually separate out the misogyny from the homophobia. Hatred of women (woman-ness) is such a huge part of the hatred of queer men, in particular. And I maintain the effeminacy issue re: boys is absolutely linked to a fear of queer. Conversely - a big part of the disdain for women (or bois) who are seen as not feminine enough is that they forget their 'place' as women. Misogyny? You bet. But homophobia too. That's my fifty cents ;)
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteLOL. This is clearly going to take more wine to sort through. However, I would like to point out that around the world, the countries/cultures which are usually touted as most homophobic are "coincidentally" also those which have strong view on gender and limitations on women's freedoms. In countries where there are strong female roles (e.g. the Philippines), there are also cultural accommodations made for homosexuality (e.g. roles for bakla and tombois). :D
ReplyDeleteWe'll discuss over wine next trip home, MB.
ReplyDeleteYou rock. There, I said it. :)
ReplyDelete